Farm Subsidy information
Huron County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Huron County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,978
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Huron County, Michigan totaled $468,339,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bischer Farms Partnership | Ruth, MI 48470 | $4,650,734 |
2 | Herford Brothers | Elkton, MI 48731 | $3,133,269 |
3 | J A D E | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $2,947,223 |
4 | E T L Farms Inc | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $2,090,337 |
5 | T & H Farms | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $2,013,074 |
6 | Te Voortwis Dairy LLC | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $1,872,789 |
7 | S & I Inc | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $1,865,215 |
8 | Edward Howard Mccrea | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $1,759,176 |
9 | Thuemmel Dairy Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $1,711,625 |
10 | Ronald William Mccrea | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $1,685,030 |
11 | Schuette Farms | Elkton, MI 48731 | $1,627,883 |
12 | E & R Farms Inc | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $1,582,234 |
13 | Grekowicz Farms Inc | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $1,513,808 |
14 | Lena Margaret Mccrea | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $1,513,572 |
15 | Mr Christopher Jay Jahn | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $1,480,196 |
16 | Rathmourne Dairy LLC | Port Hope, MI 48468 | $1,474,725 |
17 | Little-b Farms Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $1,471,328 |
18 | Denson Smith | Caseville, MI 48725 | $1,461,288 |
19 | Terry Wayne Krohn | Elkton, MI 48731 | $1,459,511 |
20 | Highland Dairy LLC | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $1,434,074 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>