Farm Subsidy information
Ingham County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Ingham County, Michigan, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 254
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ingham County, Michigan totaled $14,844,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Car-min-vu Farms LLC | Webberville, MI 48892 | $1,162,935 |
2 | Little Creeks | Mason, MI 48854 | $836,598 |
3 | Rapid Ridge Farms LLC | Mason, MI 48854 | $621,140 |
4 | Hamlin Farms | Webberville, MI 48892 | $533,760 |
5 | Kubiak Family Farms | Webberville, MI 48892 | $513,028 |
6 | Risch Farms | Webberville, MI 48892 | $382,126 |
7 | Clona Farms LLC | Dansville, MI 48819 | $345,676 |
8 | Pf Farms | Stockbridge, MI 49285 | $345,417 |
9 | Cremer Farms, L.l.c. | Williamston, MI 48895 | $330,608 |
10 | Oesterle Brothers LLC | Mason, MI 48854 | $326,990 |
11 | Jerry Jorgensen | Webberville, MI 48892 | $288,822 |
12 | Aaron Jorgensen | Williamston, MI 48895 | $255,720 |
13 | Carroll Wamhoff | East Lansing, MI 48823 | $247,300 |
14 | Ri-val-re Genetics LLC | Webberville, MI 48892 | $234,069 |
15 | Crawford Farms Grain & Seed LLC | Dansville, MI 48819 | $226,005 |
16 | Watters And Sons Farm | Stockbridge, MI 49285 | $209,624 |
17 | Hitchcock Brothers | Williamston, MI 48895 | $200,814 |
18 | Knoch Farms | Webberville, MI 48892 | $200,065 |
19 | Hawkins Homestead | Mason, MI 48854 | $195,374 |
20 | Cheney Farms | Mason, MI 48854 | $192,504 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>