Farm Subsidy information
Isabella County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Isabella County, Michigan, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 545
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Isabella County, Michigan totaled $9,755,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | House Dairy LLC | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $70,895 |
22 | Nvf Inc | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $70,889 |
23 | Mark F Mcdonald | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $70,495 |
24 | Graham Farms | Rosebush, MI 48878 | $68,077 |
25 | Neyer Farms Inc | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $67,091 |
26 | Dale Wawersik | Weidman, MI 48893 | $64,485 |
27 | Samuel L Moeggenborg | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $64,248 |
28 | Conners Farm LLC | Lake, MI 48632 | $62,302 |
29 | Hauck Seed Farm Inc | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $62,189 |
30 | Engler Dairy Farm Inc | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $59,938 |
31 | Clarke Farms LLC | Coleman, MI 48618 | $59,090 |
32 | Jacob Paul Mcconnell | Clare, MI 48617 | $56,834 |
33 | Cameron T Moeggenborg | Elwell, MI 48832 | $56,752 |
34 | Recker Family Farms LLC | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $56,703 |
35 | Pasch Farms LLC | Weidman, MI 48893 | $54,556 |
36 | Richard Kenny | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $54,450 |
37 | Gross Farms Inc | Weidman, MI 48893 | $52,524 |
38 | Joseph D Bryant | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $52,502 |
39 | Michael Turnwald | Shepherd, MI 48883 | $51,794 |
40 | Clark Dairy Farm LLC | Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 | $51,562 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”