Farm Subsidy information
Leelanau County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Leelanau County, Michigan, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 60
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Leelanau County, Michigan totaled $1,454,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hop Daddy LLC | Empire, MI 49630 | $78,693 |
2 | Bardenhagen Berries | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $26,902 |
3 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $24,520 |
4 | Fredrickson Farm | Northport, MI 49670 | $22,824 |
5 | Weaver Family Limited Partnership | Northport, MI 49670 | $11,627 |
6 | Stanton Family Orchards LLC | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $11,257 |
7 | Terry Lautner | Traverse City, MI 49684 | $10,052 |
8 | Eagle View Farms LLC | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $9,864 |
9 | Keith E Parker Tr Uad 7-16-2007 | Cedar, MI 49621 | $9,827 |
10 | Hallstedt Homestead LLC | Northport, MI 49670 | $8,230 |
11 | Stoney Point Orchards Inc | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $7,616 |
12 | D & D Noonan Farms LLC | Empire, MI 49630 | $7,379 |
13 | Noonan & Sons LLC | Maple City, MI 49664 | $7,236 |
14 | Cory L Bumgardner | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $5,710 |
15 | Janet Roth | Leland, MI 49654 | $5,366 |
16 | James Bardenhagen | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $5,262 |
17 | Wencil T Korson | Suttons Bay, MI 49682 | $4,502 |
18 | Joseph Flaska | Maple City, MI 49664 | $3,132 |
19 | Schaub Dairy Farms Inc | Lake Leelanau, MI 49653 | $3,089 |
20 | Randolph Weber | Cedar, MI 49621 | $2,990 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>