Farm Subsidy information
Marquette County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Marquette County, Michigan, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 25
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Marquette County, Michigan totaled $209,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bill Devooght | Marquette, MI 49855 | $45,684 |
| 2 | Kathryn Renee Shirley | Carlton, GA 30627 | $33,626 |
| 3 | Crystal Lynn Van Elsacker | Cornell, MI 49818 | $20,309 |
| 4 | Jerry J Debacker | Cornell, MI 49818 | $17,089 |
| 5 | Pirmans Corner Farm Inc | Skandia, MI 49885 | $15,896 |
| 6 | Jerome Verbrigghe | Rock, MI 49880 | $10,546 |
| 7 | Gabriel O Caplett | Skandia, MI 49885 | $6,284 |
| 8 | Tim Devooght | Skandia, MI 49885 | $5,445 |
| 9 | Seeds & Spores Family Farm LLC | Marquette, MI 49855 | $5,022 |
| 10 | Bahrmans Farm LLC | Skandia, MI 49885 | $4,763 |
| 11 | Billiejean Horrocks | Cornell, MI 49818 | $4,545 |
| 12 | Charles A Bergdahl | Skandia, MI 49885 | $3,832 |
| 13 | Crystal Lynn Van Elsacker | Felch, MI 49831 | $2,825 |
| 14 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $1,935 |
| 15 | Heidi Jo Heidtman-brest | Skandia, MI 49885 | $1,444 |
| 16 | Cripple Creek Land & Cattle | Felch, MI 49831 | $1,331 |
| 17 | Debacker Family Dairy Farm LLC | Daggett, MI 49821 | $1,323 |
| 18 | Linda Van Damme | Cornell, MI 49818 | $1,237 |
| 19 | Emily Bruce | Arnold, MI 49819 | $557 |
| 20 | Sandra Debacker | Cornell, MI 49818 | $537 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf