Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Ogemaw County, Michigan, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 88
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Ogemaw County, Michigan totaled $220,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tony M Rosebrugh | West Branch, MI 48661 | $15,202 |
| 2 | L J L Farms LLC | West Branch, MI 48661 | $12,863 |
| 3 | Greerview Farms Inc | West Branch, MI 48661 | $12,328 |
| 4 | Greg Illig | West Branch, MI 48661 | $10,794 |
| 5 | Gallagher Dairy Farm Inc | West Branch, MI 48661 | $10,037 |
| 6 | Brown Farms LLC | Prescott, MI 48756 | $8,920 |
| 7 | Kartes Farms LLC | Alger, MI 48610 | $8,783 |
| 8 | Rdj Dairy | Rose City, MI 48654 | $7,381 |
| 9 | Den-mar Farms L L C | West Branch, MI 48661 | $6,969 |
| 10 | Circle K Farms Inc | West Branch, MI 48661 | $6,772 |
| 11 | Bennett Dairy Farm LLC | Prescott, MI 48756 | $5,921 |
| 12 | Marshall Dairy Farm LLC | Lupton, MI 48635 | $5,806 |
| 13 | Emt Farms LLC | West Branch, MI 48661 | $5,795 |
| 14 | Clemens Dairy Farm Inc | West Branch, MI 48661 | $5,543 |
| 15 | Cedar Lane Dairy Farms | West Branch, MI 48661 | $5,372 |
| 16 | Miller Farms Enterprises L L C | Prescott, MI 48756 | $5,121 |
| 17 | Doris Grezeszak | Rose City, MI 48654 | $5,089 |
| 18 | Larry C Mier | West Branch, MI 48661 | $5,026 |
| 19 | Fritz Dairy Farm Inc | West Branch, MI 48661 | $4,732 |
| 20 | Nicholas Philip Clark | Prescott, MI 48756 | $4,715 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf