Farm Subsidy information
Saint Joseph County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Saint Joseph County, Michigan, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 425
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Saint Joseph County, Michigan totaled $12,684,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Riedstra Dairy Ltd | Mendon, MI 49072 | $604,081 |
2 | Jaca Company LLC | Mendon, MI 49072 | $479,948 |
3 | Sturgis Dairy LLC | Sturgis, MI 49091 | $455,517 |
4 | Yoder Family Farms Inc | Sturgis, MI 49091 | $452,991 |
5 | Matthew D Kauffman | Mendon, MI 49072 | $312,444 |
6 | Twin Oak Farms LLC | Schoolcraft, MI 49087 | $255,641 |
7 | County Top Farms Inc | Mendon, MI 49072 | $236,884 |
8 | Struble Farms LLC | Three Rivers, MI 49093 | $234,995 |
9 | Scattered Acres Production LLC | Constantine, MI 49042 | $234,578 |
10 | Bent Farms LLC | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $211,117 |
11 | Gem Family Farms LLC | Constantine, MI 49042 | $199,558 |
12 | Jr Cattle Company LLC | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $182,297 |
13 | Prairie Edge Farm LLC | Sturgis, MI 49091 | $176,963 |
14 | Thomas Krull | White Pigeon, MI 49099 | $166,931 |
15 | Pmca | Constantine, MI 49042 | $165,777 |
16 | Grabe's Grain Farm LLC | Sturgis, MI 49091 | $154,347 |
17 | Richard Paul Cripps | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $129,730 |
18 | Fawn River Farms | Sturgis, MI 49091 | $125,587 |
19 | Villa Miller Farms | Constantine, MI 49042 | $125,484 |
20 | T & C Wagner Farms LLC | White Pigeon, MI 49099 | $125,094 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>