Loan Deficiency in Sanilac County, Michigan, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,180
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Sanilac County, Michigan totaled $34,714,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Vandamme Farms Enterprise | Brown City, MI 48416 | $692,171 |
2 | Ken Miller Farms | Marlette, MI 48453 | $556,260 |
3 | Denis Wurmlinger | Croswell, MI 48422 | $370,476 |
4 | Grout Farms Inc | Croswell, MI 48422 | $365,402 |
5 | Triple R Farms | Snover, MI 48472 | $280,410 |
6 | Ruggles Farms | Marlette, MI 48453 | $279,211 |
7 | Allan K Shaw Inc | Marlette, MI 48453 | $276,178 |
8 | John Gough Farms Inc | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $266,298 |
9 | Loren Wayne Iseler | Peck, MI 48466 | $265,589 |
10 | Edward Gibbs | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $245,799 |
11 | Dale Stamp Farms | Marlette, MI 48453 | $243,199 |
12 | Jgdm Mcconnachie LLC | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $237,275 |
13 | Gerstenberger Farms Inc | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $223,244 |
14 | Naomi Furness Thompson | Yale, MI 48097 | $220,317 |
15 | Stolicker Farms Inc | Palms, MI 48465 | $219,124 |
16 | Mc Of Mc Inc | Minden City, MI 48456 | $216,271 |
17 | Dennis Arnold Quandt | Peck, MI 48466 | $208,959 |
18 | Harold Norman Heussner | Marlette, MI 48453 | $203,760 |
19 | D E Mann & Son | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $202,982 |
20 | Henry Albert Stoutenburg | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $201,179 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>