Farm Subsidy information
Van Buren County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Van Buren County, Michigan, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 180
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Van Buren County, Michigan totaled $5,841,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Meachum Family Farms LLC | Hartford, MI 49057 | $173,292 |
| 2 | Ransler Farms LLC | Gobles, MI 49055 | $134,529 |
| 3 | Kaleb Kolberg | Hartford, MI 49057 | $111,910 |
| 4 | Timothy C Hood | Paw Paw, MI 49079 | $108,167 |
| 5 | Kolberg Farms LLC | Lawrence, MI 49064 | $96,747 |
| 6 | Cornerstone Grains | South Haven, MI 49090 | $90,549 |
| 7 | Charles M Muvrin Jr Estate | Paw Paw, MI 49079 | $87,245 |
| 8 | David S Buss | Decatur, MI 49045 | $72,358 |
| 9 | Nobel Family Dairy LLC | Gobles, MI 49055 | $65,300 |
| 10 | Vassar Farms LLC | Hartford, MI 49057 | $52,636 |
| 11 | Mark L Ashbrook | Bloomingdale, MI 49026 | $49,173 |
| 12 | Matthew Hamlin | South Haven, MI 49090 | $48,077 |
| 13 | Duane T White | Decatur, MI 49045 | $47,144 |
| 14 | Steven M Mroczek | Decatur, MI 49045 | $34,673 |
| 15 | Shine Farms LLC | Bangor, MI 49013 | $34,340 |
| 16 | Thomas Aleksich | Marcellus, MI 49067 | $32,842 |
| 17 | Daniel Hice | Schoolcraft, MI 49087 | $32,173 |
| 18 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $30,408 |
| 19 | Fred D Boothby | Gobles, MI 49055 | $28,784 |
| 20 | Red Arrow Dairy LLC | Grand Rapids, MI 49544 | $25,404 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf