Farm Subsidy information
Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 63,033
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Minnesota totaled $1,487,000,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Raguse Family Partnership | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $465,301 |
22 | Oberg Grain | Moorhead, MN 56560 | $461,667 |
23 | Kremer Farms Partnership | Iona, MN 56141 | $443,174 |
24 | Skaurud Grain Farms | Gary, MN 56545 | $435,708 |
25 | Blawat Farms Ptr | Greenbush, MN 56726 | $432,830 |
26 | Shooting Star Native Seeds Inc | Spring Grove, MN 55974 | $430,774 |
27 | Meyer Farms LLC | Round Lake, MN 56167 | $429,917 |
28 | Meuleners Farms Grain Partnership | Young America, MN 55397 | $427,309 |
29 | Cory & Layne Ebeling Partnership | Trimont, MN 56176 | $423,488 |
30 | Bradley T Stevermer | Easton, MN 56025 | $418,253 |
31 | Wolle Farms | Saint James, MN 56081 | $418,018 |
32 | Farmop Capital, LLC ** | St Paul, MN 55101 | $417,066 |
33 | Douglas Sheely | Brownsdale, MN 55918 | $416,584 |
34 | Jam Farms Inc | Raymond, MN 56282 | $412,212 |
35 | Jirak Bros Farming Partnership | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $411,857 |
36 | Union Dairy Llp | Watkins, MN 55389 | $410,107 |
37 | B & M Farms Prtshp | Climax, MN 56523 | $408,343 |
38 | Minnwest Bank ** | Marshall, MN 56258 | $396,690 |
39 | Maday Family Farms | Granada, MN 56039 | $393,487 |
40 | Damon & Ashley Stroble Partnership | Angus, MN 56762 | $385,490 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”