Farm Subsidy information
Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Minnesota, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 62,573
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Minnesota totaled $1,547,000,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Macik Farms Partnership | Hector, MN 55342 | $432,622 |
42 | Big Stone Hutterian Brethren Inc II | Graceville, MN 56240 | $431,668 |
43 | State Bank Of Wheaton | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $431,096 |
44 | Kramer Farms II | Hector, MN 55342 | $426,688 |
45 | Spring Valley Farms Llp | Morris, MN 56267 | $421,269 |
46 | Field Brothers Farms Gp | Stephen, MN 56757 | $420,413 |
47 | Ihnen Family Farms | Round Lake, MN 56167 | $418,258 |
48 | Brian & Kevin Kuehl Farms | Glyndon, MN 56547 | $417,223 |
49 | Cory & Layne Ebeling Partnership | Trimont, MN 56176 | $415,553 |
50 | Vipond Grain Farms | Norcross, MN 56274 | $406,537 |
51 | Highland Family Farms | Mapleton, MN 56065 | $404,856 |
52 | Chs Capital LLC ** | Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077 | $404,228 |
53 | Buesing Ag Partnership | Granite Falls, MN 56241 | $403,650 |
54 | Haugo Brothers | Waubun, MN 56589 | $401,701 |
55 | Johnson Farms Of Wells | Wells, MN 56097 | $399,363 |
56 | Randy Nelson Farms Inc | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $397,577 |
57 | Evan And Brett Peterson Farms | Balaton, MN 56115 | $397,193 |
58 | Van Pork LLC | Lakefield, MN 56150 | $394,968 |
59 | Hugoson Pork Inc | Granada, MN 56039 | $393,096 |
60 | Keith Tordsen | Round Lake, MN 56167 | $390,717 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”