Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Minnesota, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 48,225

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Minnesota totaled $1,593,000,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2021
1Hader Farms PartnershipZumbrota, MN 55992$2,663,205
2Agcountry Farm Credit Services **Jamestown, ND 58402$2,503,736
3Molitor Bros FarmCannon Falls, MN 55009$2,424,011
4Pioneer Bank **Saint James, MN 56081$2,213,860
5Agquest Financial Services Inc **Renville, MN 56284$1,548,215
6Farm Services Agency **Washington, DC 20250$1,465,257
7Oberg Farms PrtshpMoorhead, MN 56560$1,277,637
8Sanders FarmsTruman, MN 56088$1,220,129
9Frontier Family FarmsAlbert Lea, MN 56007$1,149,008
10First Farmers & Merchants Bank **Fairmont, MN 56031$1,116,290
11Van Zuilen FarmsClaremont, MN 55924$1,112,865
12S & H Farms PartnershipMankato, MN 56001$971,781
13Truesdell Family Farm PartnershipSherburn, MN 56171$954,395
14Skaurud Grain FarmsGary, MN 56545$877,068
15Son-d-partnershipAdrian, MN 56110$868,550
16Christianson AgBlomkest, MN 56216$851,399
17Field Brothers Farms GpStephen, MN 56757$851,218
18Vipond Grain FarmsNorcross, MN 56274$850,037
19Pederson Brothers PartnershipBejou, MN 56516$845,083
20Wolle FarmsSaint James, MN 56081$798,131

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag