Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Minnesota, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 40,121

Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Minnesota totaled $1,757,000,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Market Facilitation Program (MFP)
1Agcountry Farm Credit Services **Jamestown, ND 58402$8,176,248
2Farm Services Agency **Washington, DC 20250$3,814,890
3Molitor Bros FarmCannon Falls, MN 55009$2,796,543
4Oberg GrainMoorhead, MN 56560$1,806,837
5Hader Farms PartnershipZumbrota, MN 55992$1,789,772
6Pederson Brothers PartnershipBejou, MN 56516$1,500,000
7Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$1,343,343
8Skaurud Grain FarmsGary, MN 56545$1,232,547
9Michael Stamer Farms General PartnershipWillmar, MN 56201$1,083,901
10Agquest Financial Services Inc **Renville, MN 56284$1,080,330
11Jirak Bros Farming PartnershipBreckenridge, MN 56520$1,055,722
12Deal Bros Farming PartnershipDoran, MN 56522$1,015,151
13Evan And Brett Peterson FarmsBalaton, MN 56115$1,000,042
14Vipond Grain FarmsNorcross, MN 56274$993,085
15Field Brothers Farms GpStephen, MN 56757$911,040
16Minnwest Bank **Marshall, MN 56258$899,230
17Ihnen Family FarmsRound Lake, MN 56167$878,928
18Sanders FarmsTruman, MN 56088$876,039
19Anderson Family FarmsBelgrade, MN 56312$864,738
20Frontier Family FarmsAlbert Lea, MN 56007$838,682

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>


Farm Subsidies Education