Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Anoka County, Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 53
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Anoka County, Minnesota totaled $22,670 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bernard J Volesky | Bethel, MN 55005 | $18,908 |
2 | Doug E Hentges | Oshkosh, WI 54901 | $5,000 |
3 | Second Harvest Farms Inc | Cedar, MN 55011 | $3,290 |
4 | Marshall Thomazin | Elk River, MN 55330 | $1,450 |
5 | Gordon E Anderson | Stacy, MN 55079 | $1,283 |
6 | James Lawrence Pieper | Anoka, MN 55303 | $595 |
7 | Larson Brothers Partnership | Ham Lake, MN 55304 | $339 |
8 | Patrick Wayne Lee | Cedar, MN 55011 | $327 |
9 | Janet F Lee | Cedar, MN 55011 | $192 |
10 | Martin T Moritz | Elk River, MN 55330 | $97 |
11 | James A Jensen | Isanti, MN 55040 | $90 |
12 | Raymond Leffingwell | Wanamingo, MN 55983 | $59 |
13 | Charles Henry Beach | Dayton, MN 55327 | $32 |
14 | Kelly Kreger | Elk River, MN 55330 | $19 |
15 | John W Hanson | Cedar, MN 55011 | $18 |
16 | Robert L Olson | Saint Francis, MN 55070 | $18 |
17 | Lyle Elverud | Fridley, MN 55432 | $14 |
18 | Leslie Gillund | Blaine, MN 55449 | $14 |
19 | Alan Reinard Pearson | Anoka, MN 55303 | $13 |
20 | Edith Mildred Hemmelgarn | Isanti, MN 55040 | $13 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>