Farm Subsidy information
Freeborn County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Freeborn County, Minnesota, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,304
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Freeborn County, Minnesota totaled $41,666,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lukes Bros Inc | Glenville, MN 56036 | $1,021,846 |
2 | Mhf Of Freeborn County, Inc. | Austin, MN 55912 | $840,549 |
3 | Frontier Family Farms | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $735,510 |
4 | Nielsen Farms Of Albert Lea, LLC | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $477,186 |
5 | John K Nielsen | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $423,135 |
6 | Adams Grain Company | Glenville, MN 56036 | $351,917 |
7 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $343,217 |
8 | Douglas W Steele | Alden, MN 56009 | $303,817 |
9 | Epland Brothers Partnership | Twin Lakes, MN 56089 | $291,057 |
10 | Thisius Farm Inc | Wells, MN 56097 | $281,979 |
11 | Kent D Brolsma | Pemberton, MN 56078 | $274,235 |
12 | S.s. Farms Of Freeborn County, Inc. | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $263,373 |
13 | Erik Nelson | Glenville, MN 56036 | $261,635 |
14 | T & T Farms Of Alden, Inc. | Alden, MN 56009 | $220,634 |
15 | Scott Thompson | Austin, MN 55912 | $219,232 |
16 | Kral Farms LLC | Glenville, MN 56036 | $217,550 |
17 | Van Erkel Farm Inc | Hollandale, MN 56045 | $203,570 |
18 | Schmidt Farms % Allen Schmidt | Alden, MN 56009 | $203,456 |
19 | Dann Phillips | Hartland, MN 56042 | $199,317 |
20 | Chad Johnson | Ellendale, MN 56026 | $194,667 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>