Farm Subsidy information
Goodhue County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Goodhue County, Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,288
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Goodhue County, Minnesota totaled $427,558,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hader Farms Partnership | Zumbrota, MN 55992 | $7,701,859 |
2 | Erickson Farms | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $2,699,950 |
3 | Brekken Farms | Dennison, MN 55018 | $2,276,067 |
4 | Perkins Farms | Red Wing, MN 55066 | $2,216,688 |
5 | Hovel Farms | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $2,047,031 |
6 | Circle K Family Farms | Lake City, MN 55041 | $1,967,774 |
7 | Kohlnhofer Farms Inc | Lake City, MN 55041 | $1,794,312 |
8 | Vangsness Bros | Kenyon, MN 55946 | $1,762,241 |
9 | Borgschatz Inc | Wanamingo, MN 55983 | $1,750,607 |
10 | Clay View Dairy Llp | Goodhue, MN 55027 | $1,695,898 |
11 | Schafer Farms Of Goodhue Inc | Goodhue, MN 55027 | $1,604,609 |
12 | Hinrichs Farms Inc | Red Wing, MN 55066 | $1,528,636 |
13 | Carlson Keith & Lee Ann | Goodhue, MN 55027 | $1,521,056 |
14 | Gary Samuelson | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $1,519,938 |
15 | Daniel F Ryan | Goodhue, MN 55027 | $1,490,264 |
16 | Don I Herrlich | Kenyon, MN 55946 | $1,412,797 |
17 | Dan Burdick | Zumbrota, MN 55992 | $1,410,668 |
18 | Rostad Farms Llp | Zumbrota, MN 55992 | $1,409,654 |
19 | Jeffrey C Davidson | Kenyon, MN 55946 | $1,403,536 |
20 | Braaten Farms | Kenyon, MN 55946 | $1,370,297 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>