Farm Subsidy information
Grant County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Grant County, Minnesota, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 878
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Grant County, Minnesota totaled $23,717,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vipond Grain Farms | Norcross, MN 56274 | $406,537 |
| 2 | Ryan L Biss | Wendell, MN 56590 | $265,075 |
| 3 | Scott Tyberg | Elbow Lake, MN 56531 | $264,355 |
| 4 | Tina M Biss | Wendell, MN 56590 | $263,271 |
| 5 | Jody Coleman | Elbow Lake, MN 56531 | $255,389 |
| 6 | Leisha Coleman | Elbow Lake, MN 56531 | $255,173 |
| 7 | Michael D Hanson | Ashby, MN 56309 | $201,953 |
| 8 | Timothy D Wiese | Elbow Lake, MN 56531 | $198,832 |
| 9 | Brutlag Farms Partnership | Wendell, MN 56590 | $198,463 |
| 10 | Tak Farms Inc | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $190,817 |
| 11 | Nicholas Coleman | Elbow Lake, MN 56531 | $190,459 |
| 12 | Lacey Ridge Farm Company | Wendell, MN 56590 | $188,042 |
| 13 | Lowell Ricks | Elbow Lake, MN 56531 | $186,570 |
| 14 | Sheila Ronhovde | Barrett, MN 56311 | $182,420 |
| 15 | Nsk Farms | Herman, MN 56248 | $177,134 |
| 16 | Gillespie Family Partnership | Elbow Lake, MN 56531 | $170,196 |
| 17 | Todd Ronhovde | Barrett, MN 56311 | $167,929 |
| 18 | Scott R Biss | Elbow Lake, MN 56531 | $163,299 |
| 19 | Paul Adams | Wendell, MN 56590 | $157,660 |
| 20 | Crystal Adams | Wendell, MN 56590 | $156,464 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf