Farm Subsidy information
Lake County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Lake County, Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 32
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lake County, Minnesota totaled $289,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Goutermont Logging LLC | Silver Bay, MN 55614 | $52,875 |
| 2 | Joseph Ernest Logging LLC | Silver Bay, MN 55614 | $52,875 |
| 3 | Fjeran Forest Products LLC | Two Harbors, MN 55616 | $52,875 |
| 4 | Jule Foster's Logging | Isabella, MN 55607 | $38,763 |
| 5 | Jon Nelson Trucking | Silver Bay, MN 55614 | $20,152 |
| 6 | Forrest Warren Johnson | Knife River, MN 55609 | $15,511 |
| 7 | Seth Nelson | Two Harbors, MN 55616 | $8,448 |
| 8 | Gordon Klein | Two Harbors, MN 55616 | $8,061 |
| 9 | Lawrence Johnson | Two Harbors, MN 55616 | $7,000 |
| 10 | Steve Cavallin | Two Harbors, MN 55616 | $6,875 |
| 11 | W J Driscoll | Saint Paul, MN 55101 | $6,624 |
| 12 | Don Warner | Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 | $3,634 |
| 13 | John Mundahl | Mounds View, MN 55112 | $2,086 |
| 14 | Jon Nelson Trucking | Finland, MN 55603 | $2,000 |
| 15 | Robert H Cary | Ely, MN 55731 | $1,862 |
| 16 | Paul Sutherland | Finland, MN 55603 | $1,772 |
| 17 | Donald Ferguson | Two Harbors, MN 55616 | $1,542 |
| 18 | Roland H Cleveland | North Branch, MN 55056 | $1,060 |
| 19 | Roy Labounty | Two Harbors, MN 55616 | $1,040 |
| 20 | Alvin Tonn | Maple Grove, MN 55369 | $692 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf