Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Martin County, Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 788
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Martin County, Minnesota totaled $47,900,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Sanders Farms | Truman, MN 56088 | $876,039 |
2 | Truesdell Family Farm Partnership | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $742,131 |
3 | Hugoson Pork Inc | Granada, MN 56039 | $500,188 |
4 | Bentdale Farms Inc | Truman, MN 56088 | $495,015 |
5 | Maday Family Farms | Granada, MN 56039 | $483,567 |
6 | Schwieger Hogs Llp | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $464,430 |
7 | North Ridge Horizons Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $375,000 |
8 | Stone Lake Farm Inc | Trimont, MN 56176 | $375,000 |
9 | Lbh Partners Llp | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $375,000 |
10 | Jeffrey Hoppe | Truman, MN 56088 | $366,741 |
11 | Sjs Farms | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $357,890 |
12 | Cory & Layne Ebeling Partnership | Trimont, MN 56176 | $336,960 |
13 | Randy Nelson Farms Inc | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $332,630 |
14 | Windmill Farm Usa Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $329,922 |
15 | Caesar Larson | Amboy, MN 56010 | $329,046 |
16 | Tanya Larson | Amboy, MN 56010 | $329,046 |
17 | Lily Creek Farm Inc | Welcome, MN 56181 | $309,185 |
18 | Moore Grain Inc | Blue Earth, MN 56013 | $309,106 |
19 | Tim Steuber Pork Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $306,428 |
20 | Roger L Matejka | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $303,584 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>