Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Martin County, Minnesota, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 723
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Martin County, Minnesota totaled $29,208,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sanders Farms | Truman, MN 56088 | $744,496 |
| 2 | Maday Family Farms | Granada, MN 56039 | $407,920 |
| 3 | Hugoson Pork Inc | Granada, MN 56039 | $325,165 |
| 4 | Schwieger Hogs Llp | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $317,073 |
| 5 | Truesdell Family Farm Partnership | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $306,135 |
| 6 | Cory & Layne Ebeling Partnership | Trimont, MN 56176 | $281,639 |
| 7 | Randy Nelson Farms Inc | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $280,828 |
| 8 | Caesar Larson | Amboy, MN 56010 | $275,404 |
| 9 | Tanya Larson | Amboy, MN 56010 | $275,404 |
| 10 | North Ridge Horizons Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $250,000 |
| 11 | Lbh Partners Llp | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $250,000 |
| 12 | Faber Bros Farm | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $242,548 |
| 13 | Bentdale Farms Inc | Truman, MN 56088 | $237,719 |
| 14 | Ba Operations LLC | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $206,291 |
| 15 | Center Creek Pork Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $201,583 |
| 16 | Brockmann Bros | Granada, MN 56039 | $193,381 |
| 17 | Esb Farm Inc | Truman, MN 56088 | $192,772 |
| 18 | Lily Creek Farm Inc | Welcome, MN 56181 | $191,067 |
| 19 | Stone Lake Farm Inc | Trimont, MN 56176 | $188,165 |
| 20 | Dennis Bremer | Ceylon, MN 56121 | $183,700 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf