Farm Subsidy information
Morrison County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Morrison County, Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,563
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Morrison County, Minnesota totaled $279,502,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Darrel Saehr | Pierz, MN 56364 | $889,846 |
22 | David Kloss | Royalton, MN 56373 | $875,754 |
23 | Golden Oak Dairy Farm | Pierz, MN 56364 | $873,963 |
24 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $848,330 |
25 | Robert L Anderson | Little Falls, MN 56345 | $812,929 |
26 | Virnig Farms Partnership | Pierz, MN 56364 | $811,126 |
27 | Leidenfrost Farms | Pierz, MN 56364 | $785,837 |
28 | Myron Czech | Little Falls, MN 56345 | $775,467 |
29 | Gerald Herzog | Swanville, MN 56382 | $767,127 |
30 | Robert G Wimmer | Royalton, MN 56373 | $750,231 |
31 | Capko Brothers Farms LLC | Swanville, MN 56382 | $728,025 |
32 | Brian Przybilla | Pierz, MN 56364 | $712,425 |
33 | Dean Marshik | Pierz, MN 56364 | $700,118 |
34 | Vetsch Dairy Farm | Little Falls, MN 56345 | $697,503 |
35 | David Stich | Randall, MN 56475 | $644,638 |
36 | Czech Dairy Inc | Little Falls, MN 56345 | $615,005 |
37 | Sandy Hill Farms LLC | Royalton, MN 56373 | $605,267 |
38 | Roger J Pawlu | Pierz, MN 56364 | $600,101 |
39 | David Michael Lanners | Royalton, MN 56373 | $599,119 |
40 | Kliber Sales Inc | Little Falls, MN 56345 | $587,944 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”