Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Otter Tail County, Minnesota, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 528
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Otter Tail County, Minnesota totaled $6,792,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Valley Ridge Grains Ltd | Henning, MN 56551 | $280,492 |
2 | Agcountry Farm Credit Services ** | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $272,209 |
3 | Olson & Sons | Parkers Prairie, MN 56361 | $200,089 |
4 | Roy Olson Partnership | Parkers Prairie, MN 56361 | $151,861 |
5 | Carlson Turkey Farms Limited | Parkers Prairie, MN 56361 | $108,458 |
6 | Farm Boys LLC | Parkers Prairie, MN 56361 | $86,540 |
7 | Steven G Inwards | Parkers Prairie, MN 56361 | $79,496 |
8 | Leonard Holmer | Perham, MN 56573 | $78,862 |
9 | Pine Breeze Farm LLC | Deer Creek, MN 56527 | $77,948 |
10 | Keith Goeller | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $74,886 |
11 | Eckhoff Farms | Henning, MN 56551 | $71,110 |
12 | John Schultz | Frazee, MN 56544 | $68,137 |
13 | Wehking Farm | Parkers Prairie, MN 56361 | $66,137 |
14 | Brent Roller | Hewitt, MN 56453 | $64,811 |
15 | Bryce L Blickenstaff | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $62,234 |
16 | Djm Farms Inc | Perham, MN 56573 | $60,504 |
17 | Wayland State Bank ** | Columbus Junction, IA 52738 | $55,539 |
18 | Charles Guck | Perham, MN 56573 | $53,771 |
19 | Ct Farms LLC | Parkers Prairie, MN 56361 | $53,164 |
20 | Huebsch Farms Inc | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $52,256 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>