Farm Subsidy information
Waseca County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Waseca County, Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,230
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $347,906,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Drager Farms Inc | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $2,770,540 |
| 2 | Pinedale Farms | Waseca, MN 56093 | $2,592,539 |
| 3 | Trams Farms Inc | Janesville, MN 56048 | $2,545,591 |
| 4 | Wacholz Brothers | New Richland, MN 56072 | $2,147,384 |
| 5 | Richard Norbert Schultz | New Richland, MN 56072 | $1,872,942 |
| 6 | Kevin K Remund | Morristown, MN 55052 | $1,748,018 |
| 7 | Blane Lloyd Amundson | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $1,737,229 |
| 8 | Scott Brian Hildebrandt | Waseca, MN 56093 | $1,721,705 |
| 9 | Greg John Strobel | Pemberton, MN 56078 | $1,719,221 |
| 10 | David John Schultz | Janesville, MN 56048 | $1,651,959 |
| 11 | Burke Farms | Janesville, MN 56048 | $1,580,837 |
| 12 | David John Winegar | Waseca, MN 56093 | $1,519,751 |
| 13 | Danny R Morris | Morristown, MN 55052 | $1,497,183 |
| 14 | Lundquist Bros | Janesville, MN 56048 | $1,396,677 |
| 15 | Merrill Mansfield Dahle | Waseca, MN 56093 | $1,395,251 |
| 16 | Dale Curtis Ewert | Janesville, MN 56048 | $1,355,987 |
| 17 | Allen Lyle Hagen | New Richland, MN 56072 | $1,335,351 |
| 18 | Kerry Ann Amundson | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $1,313,538 |
| 19 | Loren Leslie Schoenrock | New Richland, MN 56072 | $1,306,279 |
| 20 | David Arnold Routh | New Richland, MN 56072 | $1,305,208 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf