Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Waseca County, Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 711
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $352,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | George W Byron | New Richland, MN 56072 | $8,847 |
2 | Keith D Remund | Waseca, MN 56093 | $8,101 |
3 | Scott Gregg Singlestad | Waseca, MN 56093 | $7,359 |
4 | Charles Steven Hagen | New Richland, MN 56072 | $6,521 |
5 | Randy Gene Hagen | New Richland, MN 56072 | $6,519 |
6 | Keith George Morgan | Janesville, MN 56048 | $6,405 |
7 | Dennis Joseph Jewison | Janesville, MN 56048 | $6,173 |
8 | Neil Warren Roesler | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $5,878 |
9 | Gene Terry Roesler | Waldorf, MN 56091 | $5,877 |
10 | Milton Nelson | New Richland, MN 56072 | $5,720 |
11 | Calvin Keith Priem | Elysian, MN 56028 | $5,608 |
12 | Leonard Schultz | Hartland, MN 56042 | $5,581 |
13 | James William Byron | Waseca, MN 56093 | $5,326 |
14 | Glenn Robert Hoehn | New Richland, MN 56072 | $5,277 |
15 | Paul John Britton | Waseca, MN 56093 | $5,042 |
16 | Mark Jay Longeneker | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $5,025 |
17 | Alan Donald Lewer | Waseca, MN 56093 | $5,025 |
18 | University Of Minnesota | Crookston, MN 56716 | $5,022 |
19 | Jeffrey Mark Kunz | Waseca, MN 56093 | $5,020 |
20 | Randall Orlin Lewer | New Richland, MN 56072 | $5,018 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>