Commodity Certificates in Waseca County, Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 29
Recipients of Commodity Certificates from farms in Waseca County, Minnesota totaled $178,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Commodity Certificates 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Emerald Acres Inc | Janesville, MN 56048 | $38,091 |
| 2 | Drager Farms Inc | Minnesota Lake, MN 56068 | $23,371 |
| 3 | Lee William Born | Janesville, MN 56048 | $22,207 |
| 4 | James Craig Eaton | Waseca, MN 56093 | $19,544 |
| 5 | Scott Brian Hildebrandt | Waseca, MN 56093 | $12,850 |
| 6 | Lane Alan Wacholz | New Richland, MN 56072 | $12,712 |
| 7 | Howard David Lewer | Waseca, MN 56093 | $7,221 |
| 8 | Richard Norbert Schultz | New Richland, MN 56072 | $7,200 |
| 9 | Harlan Alfred Schlaak | New Richland, MN 56072 | $5,292 |
| 10 | Wacholz Brothers | New Richland, MN 56072 | $5,132 |
| 11 | Todd Dale Joecks | New Richland, MN 56072 | $3,589 |
| 12 | Carol Jeane Schlaak | New Richland, MN 56072 | $3,528 |
| 13 | Margaret Mary Hildebrandt | Waseca, MN 56093 | $3,213 |
| 14 | Merrill Mansfield Dahle | Waseca, MN 56093 | $2,775 |
| 15 | Collin Bluhm | Mankato, MN 56001 | $2,350 |
| 16 | Wayne William Miller | New Richland, MN 56072 | $2,312 |
| 17 | Zimmerman Farms Waseca | Waseca, MN 56093 | $1,774 |
| 18 | Michael Ray Powell | Waseca, MN 56093 | $1,377 |
| 19 | Calvin Keith Priem | Elysian, MN 56028 | $1,109 |
| 20 | Paul George Berry | Janesville, MN 56048 | $900 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf