Total Commodity Programs in Wilkin County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 488
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Wilkin County, Minnesota totaled $9,793,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jeremy Tischer | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $87,012 |
22 | Etzler Farms Inc | Foxhome, MN 56543 | $85,738 |
23 | Jlr Farms Inc | Campbell, MN 56522 | $84,902 |
24 | Robb Q Dohman Farm Inc | Wahpeton, ND 58075 | $84,683 |
25 | Bmd Farms Inc | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $84,044 |
26 | Cdjk Hasbargen Partnership | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $83,135 |
27 | Jordan Yaggie | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $82,259 |
28 | Wiertzema Farms Inc | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $75,655 |
29 | Larson Farms Since 1871 Family Lllp | Rothsay, MN 56579 | $74,284 |
30 | Richard Scheffler | Barnesville, MN 56514 | $72,807 |
31 | Blaufuss Farms Inc | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $72,099 |
32 | Kubela Farms | Wahpeton, ND 58075 | $68,901 |
33 | Matthew Hasbargen Farm LLC | Fargo, ND 58104 | $67,664 |
34 | Peter Aasness | Fergus Falls, MN 56537 | $67,457 |
35 | Marc Hasbargen Farm Inc | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $65,851 |
36 | Lowell Picotte | Wolverton, MN 56594 | $63,564 |
37 | Kurt Hovland | Barnesville, MN 56514 | $63,302 |
38 | Craig Carter | Tintah, MN 56583 | $62,933 |
39 | Thomas And Susan Arnhalt Farms Inc | Wolverton, MN 56594 | $62,312 |
40 | Kressin Farms Incorporated | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $61,936 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”