Farm Subsidy information
Yellow Medicine County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Yellow Medicine County, Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,710
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Yellow Medicine County, Minnesota totaled $561,229,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Enstad Bros | Granite Falls, MN 56241 | $3,202,082 |
2 | Buesing Ag Partnership | Granite Falls, MN 56241 | $2,262,072 |
3 | Dwayne S Erickson | Granite Falls, MN 56241 | $2,211,905 |
4 | Knudson Brothers Farm Partnership | Granite Falls, MN 56241 | $2,048,350 |
5 | Posen Livestock Company LLC | Wood Lake, MN 56297 | $1,907,549 |
6 | Scott Murray Wintz | Clarkfield, MN 56223 | $1,889,547 |
7 | Oftedahl Partners | Hanley Falls, MN 56245 | $1,818,309 |
8 | B-c-h Enterprises Llp | Boyd, MN 56218 | $1,800,616 |
9 | Risa Brothers | Clarkfield, MN 56223 | $1,765,379 |
10 | Citrowske Farms Partnership | Canby, MN 56220 | $1,711,297 |
11 | Verhelst Brothers Partnership | Canby, MN 56220 | $1,653,354 |
12 | Connie Erickson | Granite Falls, MN 56241 | $1,613,327 |
13 | Tommy K Listul | Clarkfield, MN 56223 | $1,601,755 |
14 | Jerel Lee Enstad | Granite Falls, MN 56241 | $1,580,013 |
15 | 4 S Farms General Partnership | Wood Lake, MN 56297 | $1,576,256 |
16 | Larry Bendix | Boyd, MN 56218 | $1,571,521 |
17 | Loose Farms Inc | Boyd, MN 56218 | $1,380,113 |
18 | Donn & Gary Peterson Partnership | Canby, MN 56220 | $1,353,678 |
19 | Danny J Larson | Minneota, MN 56264 | $1,315,919 |
20 | Jerome Leroy Pridal | Slayton, MN 56172 | $1,305,485 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>