Farm Subsidy information

Yellow Medicine County, Minnesota

Total Subsidies in Yellow Medicine County, Minnesota, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,710

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Yellow Medicine County, Minnesota totaled $561,229,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2021
1Enstad BrosGranite Falls, MN 56241$3,202,082
2Buesing Ag PartnershipGranite Falls, MN 56241$2,262,072
3Dwayne S EricksonGranite Falls, MN 56241$2,211,905
4Knudson Brothers Farm PartnershipGranite Falls, MN 56241$2,048,350
5Posen Livestock Company LLCWood Lake, MN 56297$1,907,549
6Scott Murray WintzClarkfield, MN 56223$1,889,547
7Oftedahl PartnersHanley Falls, MN 56245$1,818,309
8B-c-h Enterprises LlpBoyd, MN 56218$1,800,616
9Risa BrothersClarkfield, MN 56223$1,765,379
10Citrowske Farms PartnershipCanby, MN 56220$1,711,297
11Verhelst Brothers PartnershipCanby, MN 56220$1,653,354
12Connie EricksonGranite Falls, MN 56241$1,613,327
13Tommy K ListulClarkfield, MN 56223$1,601,755
14Jerel Lee EnstadGranite Falls, MN 56241$1,580,013
154 S Farms General PartnershipWood Lake, MN 56297$1,576,256
16Larry BendixBoyd, MN 56218$1,571,521
17Loose Farms IncBoyd, MN 56218$1,380,113
18Donn & Gary Peterson PartnershipCanby, MN 56220$1,353,678
19Danny J LarsonMinneota, MN 56264$1,315,919
20Jerome Leroy PridalSlayton, MN 56172$1,305,485

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag