Total Commodity Programs in Yellow Medicine County, Minnesota, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,621

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Yellow Medicine County, Minnesota totaled $338,473,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2021
1Enstad BrosGranite Falls, MN 56241$3,166,710
2Dwayne S EricksonGranite Falls, MN 56241$1,934,315
3Buesing Ag PartnershipGranite Falls, MN 56241$1,854,369
4Posen Livestock Company LLCWood Lake, MN 56297$1,848,877
5Knudson Brothers Farm PartnershipGranite Falls, MN 56241$1,804,736
6B-c-h Enterprises LlpBoyd, MN 56218$1,795,500
7Scott Murray WintzClarkfield, MN 56223$1,699,895
8Oftedahl PartnersHanley Falls, MN 56245$1,639,421
9Risa BrothersClarkfield, MN 56223$1,621,611
10Connie EricksonGranite Falls, MN 56241$1,515,455
114 S Farms General PartnershipWood Lake, MN 56297$1,499,153
12Larry BendixBoyd, MN 56218$1,448,293
13Tommy K ListulClarkfield, MN 56223$1,446,758
14Citrowske Farms PartnershipCanby, MN 56220$1,392,380
15Loose Farms IncBoyd, MN 56218$1,374,279
16Danny J LarsonMinneota, MN 56264$1,289,758
17Verhelst Brothers PartnershipCanby, MN 56220$1,264,430
18Donn & Gary Peterson PartnershipCanby, MN 56220$1,245,532
19Jerel Lee EnstadGranite Falls, MN 56241$1,244,772
20Richard ChristophersonClarkfield, MN 56223$1,227,038

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag