Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Mississippi, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 9,120

Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Mississippi totaled $637,328,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC)
1995-2021
1First South Farm Credit Aca **Winnsboro, LA 71295$22,136,180
2Planters Bank & Trust Company **Indianola, MS 38751$20,935,077
3First National Bank Of Clarksdale **Clarksdale, MS 38614$14,136,970
4Guaranty Bank & Trust Co **Belzoni, MS 39038$12,056,515
5Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$10,618,775
6The Jefferson Bank **Greenville, MS 38704$10,047,323
7Regions Bank **Grenada, MS 38901$8,878,168
8Bank Of Commerce **Greenwood, MS 38935$8,474,117
9Bank Of Anguilla **Anguilla, MS 38721$8,402,319
10Bankplus **Yazoo City, MS 39194$6,603,500
11First Security Bank **Batesville, MS 38606$6,378,293
12State Bank & Trust Company **Greenwood, MS 38935$6,269,377
13Citizens Bank & Trust Co **Marks, MS 38646$5,956,663
14Southern Agricultural Credit Corp **Rolling Fork, MS 39159$5,349,972
15Southern Bancorp Bank **Trumann, AR 72472$3,857,333
16Steele FarmsHollandale, MS 38748$3,754,333
17Seward & Son Planting CompanyLouise, MS 39097$3,696,032
18Staple Cotton Discount CorpGreenwood, MS 38935$3,196,662
19Circle H Joint VentureCleveland, MS 38732$3,069,541
20Satterfield FarmsBenoit, MS 38725$2,984,952

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag