SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program in Mississippi, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 639
Recipients of SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program from farms in Mississippi totaled $21,790,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Haynes Farms Partnership | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $599,920 |
| 2 | Swarek Partnership | Gulfport, MS 39501 | $334,856 |
| 3 | Thomas Farms Partnership | Batesville, MS 38606 | $320,876 |
| 4 | Selman Farms | Monticello, MS 39654 | $312,098 |
| 5 | Arkla Miss Farms | Madison, MS 39130 | $308,368 |
| 6 | Russell Moore | Houston, MS 38851 | $300,000 |
| 7 | Hargrave Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $294,591 |
| 8 | Glen Allan Farm Service Inc | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $290,321 |
| 9 | Elm Tree Farms Inc | Houston, MS 38851 | $262,696 |
| 10 | Payne Planting Co | Leland, MS 38756 | $207,916 |
| 11 | Gilmer Farms | Columbus, MS 39705 | $204,906 |
| 12 | John Michael Landreth | Vardaman, MS 38878 | $200,000 |
| 13 | C & P Farms | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $200,000 |
| 14 | A E Crosthwait Farming & Planting | Houston, MS 38851 | $200,000 |
| 15 | Pillow Farms | Satartia, MS 39162 | $200,000 |
| 16 | Crosthwait Equipment Co Farm | Houston, MS 38851 | $197,542 |
| 17 | Erickson Planting Company | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $196,916 |
| 18 | Lampley Farms | Vaughan, MS 39179 | $191,575 |
| 19 | Amn Inc | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $187,756 |
| 20 | T & K Farms | Tchula, MS 39169 | $186,360 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf