Total Conservation Programs in Mississippi, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 44,867

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Mississippi totaled $1,202,000,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2021
21Jay H SchertzLowpoint, IL 61545$1,062,078
22Ashland PlantationSchlater, MS 38952$1,061,807
23Cunningham Cunningham Et AlBrooksville, MS 39739$1,044,739
24Barbee & Clapp IncWest Point, MS 39773$1,026,780
25Riverside Farms IncChapel Hill, NC 27516$999,686
26Bruce A PattersonOxford, MS 38655$999,493
27Duncan F WilliamsMemphis, TN 38138$975,770
28Tkach Land PartnershipWest Point, MS 39773$973,698
29Tenax ForestaireRidgeland, MS 39157$972,684
30Pugh Farms LpBelzoni, MS 39038$968,659
31Diamond Woods PartnershipBrickeys, AR 72320$966,669
32Quiet Shades Pltn IncVaughan, MS 39179$961,761
33Mississippi CollegeColumbus, MS 39702$958,385
34Ernest G ThomasVicksburg, MS 39180$955,322
35Tatum Timber Co LpHattiesburg, MS 39401$954,485
36Manassas Junction Company IncJackson, MS 39205$951,578
37Helen Faye S SorrellsBatesville, MS 38606$948,818
38Charles Buck PilkintonColumbus, MS 39703$940,022
39Noah Robert Jackson IIIClinton, MS 39056$927,116
40Emily Williams DunnMountain Brk, AL 35213$924,501

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag