SELECT * FROM cou_mtotal WHERE fips='28011' AND progcode='total_dp ' AND `rank`>=1 LIMIT 0,20

Total Direct Payments in Bolivar County, Mississippi, 1995-2020‡

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 957

Recipients of Total Direct Payments from farms in Bolivar County, Mississippi totaled $157,138,000 in from 1995-2020‡.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Direct Payments
1995-2020
1Perthshire Farms *Gunnison, MS 38746$3,960,508
2Satterfield Farms *Benoit, MS 38725$3,431,477
3Fioranelli Brothers Joint Venture *Cleveland, MS 38732$2,977,706
4Circle H Joint Venture *Cleveland, MS 38732$2,737,260
5Maxwell Farms *Benoit, MS 38725$2,213,108
6Aguzzi Farms A Partnership *Cleveland, MS 38732$2,139,790
7Rizzo Farms Joint Venture *Cleveland, MS 38732$2,058,701
8Morgan Planting Co Partnership *Shaw, MS 38773$1,874,532
9Morgan Farms *Cleveland, MS 38732$1,858,720
10Allendale Planting Co *Shelby, MS 38774$1,763,233
11H & H Farms No 2 *Benoit, MS 38725$1,595,525
12Satterfield Circle Farm *Benoit, MS 38725$1,589,498
13Mosco Farms Partnership *Cleveland, MS 38732$1,566,257
14Tabb Farms Partnership *Cleveland, MS 38732$1,553,168
15Jtmp Rocconi Farms No 2 *Cleveland, MS 38732$1,538,300
16Pemble Farms *Merigold, MS 38759$1,488,396
17Rocconi Farms *Boyle, MS 38730$1,461,465
18Prewitt Farms *Boyle, MS 38730$1,412,054
19Gant & Sons Partnership *Merigold, MS 38759$1,403,341
20K & G Farms Partnership *Shelby, MS 38774$1,280,858

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag