Total Commodity Programs in Bolivar County, Mississippi, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,604

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Bolivar County, Mississippi totaled $704,189,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2021
1Satterfield FarmsBenoit, MS 38725$13,791,860
2Maxwell FarmsBenoit, MS 38725$13,516,275
3Circle H Joint VentureCleveland, MS 38732$13,219,580
4Perthshire FarmsGunnison, MS 38746$12,317,411
5Morgan FarmsCleveland, MS 38732$11,903,127
6Fioranelli Brothers Joint VentureCleveland, MS 38732$11,437,718
7Aguzzi Farms A PartnershipCleveland, MS 38732$10,530,623
8Allendale Planting CoShelby, MS 38774$9,664,311
9Rizzo Farms Joint VentureCleveland, MS 38732$7,915,883
10Ritchey Bayou FarmsGreenville, MS 38703$7,850,301
11Prewitt FarmsBoyle, MS 38730$7,305,646
12Pemble FarmsMerigold, MS 38759$6,633,572
13Coghlan FarmsBenoit, MS 38725$6,616,896
14Morgan Planting Co PartnershipShaw, MS 38773$6,398,204
15Farmer Planting CompanyBenoit, MS 38725$6,055,541
16Satterfield Circle FarmBenoit, MS 38725$5,896,533
17First South Farm Credit Aca **Winnsboro, LA 71295$5,742,042
18Pemble Farms Partnership IIMerigold, MS 38759$5,639,959
19Brushy Lake Farms Of Bolivar CoClarksdale, MS 38614$5,613,471
20Waxhaw FarmsRosedale, MS 38769$5,575,310

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag