Farm Subsidy information
Clay County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Clay County, Mississippi, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,281
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clay County, Mississippi totaled $53,634,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Billy Randy Simmons | West Point, MS 39773 | $1,877,287 |
2 | Donald R Depriest | Columbus, MS 39703 | $1,409,369 |
3 | Ralph P And Tanya J Dexter Dba D And D Farm | West Point, MS 39773 | $1,363,143 |
4 | B Bryan Farms Inc | West Point, MS 39773 | $1,237,997 |
5 | Aesland Farms | Prairie, MS 39756 | $1,065,157 |
6 | Paul Bert Brand | West Point, MS 39773 | $1,048,343 |
7 | Tkach Land Partnership | West Point, MS 39773 | $973,970 |
8 | Rhonda B Jolly | Houston, MS 38851 | $594,261 |
9 | Bryanmere Inc | West Point, MS 39773 | $577,555 |
10 | Richard Haga | West Point, MS 39773 | $559,223 |
11 | Robley E Wooten Jr | West Point, MS 39773 | $538,910 |
12 | Jay H Schertz | Lowpoint, IL 61545 | $531,071 |
13 | L C Kellogg Jr | West Point, MS 39773 | $475,635 |
14 | Patrick E Carty | Pheba, MS 39755 | $474,901 |
15 | Tim Hoing | Randolph, MS 38864 | $452,892 |
16 | Edwin A Strickland | Pheba, MS 39755 | $432,127 |
17 | B J Farms Inc | Inverness, MS 38753 | $408,624 |
18 | Carl Fox Haas | West Point, MS 39773 | $394,367 |
19 | Steve T Scott Farms Inc | Hartford, AL 36344 | $391,636 |
20 | Toxey Daniel Haas III | West Point, MS 39773 | $387,012 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>