Farm Subsidy information
Clay County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Clay County, Mississippi, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 429
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clay County, Mississippi totaled $4,426,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Steve T Scott Farms Inc | Hartford, AL 36344 | $391,636 |
| 2 | Billy Randy Simmons | West Point, MS 39773 | $240,174 |
| 3 | B Bryan Farms Inc | West Point, MS 39773 | $164,914 |
| 4 | Prairie Livestock LLC | West Point, MS 39773 | $155,537 |
| 5 | Willow Lake Catfish Inc | West Point, MS 39773 | $127,794 |
| 6 | William Glynn Robinson | West Point, MS 39773 | $112,978 |
| 7 | James D Bryan | West Point, MS 39773 | $110,755 |
| 8 | Jonas Ben Koehn | West Point, MS 39773 | $101,855 |
| 9 | Bryanmere Inc | West Point, MS 39773 | $91,376 |
| 10 | Thad Holcombe Dba Limestone Cattle | West Point, MS 39773 | $90,640 |
| 11 | Nelson Koehn | West Point, MS 39773 | $56,543 |
| 12 | Aesland Farms | Prairie, MS 39756 | $49,015 |
| 13 | H & M Planting Co., LLC | Aberdeen, MS 39730 | $48,440 |
| 14 | Jason D Hill | Woodland, MS 39776 | $47,411 |
| 15 | Elmer J Todd Jr | West Point, MS 39773 | $43,259 |
| 16 | Thomas C Keys | West Point, MS 39773 | $42,218 |
| 17 | D And D Farm | West Point, MS 39773 | $41,844 |
| 18 | Abbington Enterprises Inc. | Tupelo, MS 38801 | $37,810 |
| 19 | Steve Walker | Mantee, MS 39751 | $36,430 |
| 20 | Rhonda B Jolly | Houston, MS 38851 | $36,087 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf