Farm Subsidy information
Holmes County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Holmes County, Mississippi, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 380
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Holmes County, Mississippi totaled $15,363,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Little Omega Farms | Tchula, MS 39169 | $837,697 |
2 | William Dunn Farms II | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $668,122 |
3 | Southern Agricultural Credit Corp ** | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $577,845 |
4 | Bailey Company | Madison, MS 39110 | $515,703 |
5 | Bankplus ** | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $488,522 |
6 | Triple D Planting Co II | Lexington, MS 39095 | $432,624 |
7 | Killebrew Cotton Co | Greenwood, MS 38935 | $399,874 |
8 | Michael P Martin Farms | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $397,674 |
9 | Bank Of Commerce ** | Greenwood, MS 38935 | $370,472 |
10 | James Osborn Farms | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $331,540 |
11 | R & T Hutton | Tchula, MS 39169 | $318,313 |
12 | Chenoah Planting | Tchula, MS 39169 | $266,537 |
13 | Horseshoe Joint Venture | Tchula, MS 39169 | $252,484 |
14 | K And K Farms | Tchula, MS 39169 | $242,326 |
15 | Bryant Parrish Farms Ptnr | Lexington, MS 39095 | $237,538 |
16 | Oneal Planting Company | Tchula, MS 39169 | $234,899 |
17 | P & S Farms Partnership | Tchula, MS 39169 | $231,490 |
18 | Cooper Planting Company | Madison, MS 39110 | $225,637 |
19 | Donald Farms | Goodman, MS 39079 | $211,676 |
20 | W & S Farms | Pickens, MS 39146 | $205,827 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>