Farm Subsidy information
Jones County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Jones County, Mississippi, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,285
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Jones County, Mississippi totaled $18,831,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | John M Christian | Laurel, MS 39441 | $444,242 |
2 | Haynes Family Limited Partnership | Ellisville, MS 39437 | $440,838 |
3 | Jones County School District | Ellisville, MS 39437 | $399,648 |
4 | Terry D Jefcoat | Soso, MS 39480 | $290,670 |
5 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $282,158 |
6 | A C Knight III | Laurel, MS 39443 | $279,330 |
7 | Tl Investments Lp C/o Jeffrey Jam | Laurel, MS 39440 | $228,355 |
8 | William Lewis Thames | Laurel, MS 39440 | $225,461 |
9 | Terry W Hinton | Ellisville, MS 39437 | $217,756 |
10 | James Wendel Turner | Ellisville, MS 39437 | $215,932 |
11 | James Robert Sullivan | Purvis, MS 39475 | $201,929 |
12 | James Mickey Cheeks | Ellisville, MS 39437 | $181,995 |
13 | Joe S Ellzey | Ellisville, MS 39437 | $172,198 |
14 | Larry Norwood | Laurel, MS 39443 | $161,911 |
15 | Charles M Baylis | Moselle, MS 39459 | $152,482 |
16 | Douglas F Jefcoat | Soso, MS 39480 | $150,500 |
17 | Joe Ned Nester | Laurel, MS 39440 | $137,938 |
18 | Dennis Mitchell | Collins, MS 39428 | $137,535 |
19 | Mulloy Family Limited Partnership | Laurel, MS 39441 | $136,538 |
20 | Charles E Turner | Ellisville, MS 39437 | $131,212 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>