Farm Subsidy information
Lee County, Mississippi
Total Subsidies in Lee County, Mississippi, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 391
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lee County, Mississippi totaled $8,650,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mcfarling Farms Partnership | Tupelo, MS 38801 | $437,061 |
| 2 | H H Farms | Tupelo, MS 38804 | $351,786 |
| 3 | Mccord Farms, LLC | Tupelo, MS 38804 | $319,660 |
| 4 | Bucy Hill Farms Inc | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $294,641 |
| 5 | Letson Farms | Guntown, MS 38849 | $292,516 |
| 6 | Mud Creek Farms Inc | Blue Springs, MS 38828 | $291,892 |
| 7 | River Creek Farms Inc | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $289,099 |
| 8 | Brewer Bottom Farms Inc | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $277,963 |
| 9 | Sand Creek Farms Inc | Tupelo, MS 38804 | $272,195 |
| 10 | Hancock Creek Farms Inc | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $266,770 |
| 11 | Pea Ridge Farms Inc | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $265,456 |
| 12 | Imc Farms Inc | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $239,916 |
| 13 | Buster Brown Farms Inc | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $224,929 |
| 14 | Shumpert Farms Partnership | Tupelo, MS 38804 | $222,407 |
| 15 | Swann & Sons Farms, LLC | Guntown, MS 38849 | $211,764 |
| 16 | Clay Mask Dba Sweet Water Farms | Shannon, MS 38868 | $202,272 |
| 17 | Bucy & Long Family Farms Inc | Saltillo, MS 38866 | $169,912 |
| 18 | Michael Barber | Plantersville, MS 38862 | $133,488 |
| 19 | Herman E Hussey Sr | Tupelo, MS 38804 | $126,112 |
| 20 | M H Jones Jr | Shannon, MS 38868 | $125,270 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf