Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Leflore County, Mississippi, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 328
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Leflore County, Mississippi totaled $15,510,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New Hope Farms | Schlater, MS 38952 | $932,535 |
| 2 | O F Bledsoe Pltn | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $456,930 |
| 3 | Makamson Planting Co | Morgan City, MS 38946 | $447,852 |
| 4 | Dunn Farms | Itta Bena, MS 38941 | $444,851 |
| 5 | Garry Makamson Farms | Morgan City, MS 38946 | $420,085 |
| 6 | Adron Farms | Minter City, MS 38944 | $413,268 |
| 7 | Bare Bones Farms | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $357,725 |
| 8 | Idlewood Plantation | Sidon, MS 38954 | $301,105 |
| 9 | Wildwood Farms | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $287,176 |
| 10 | Egypt Planting Company III | Cruger, MS 38924 | $264,883 |
| 11 | Saunders Farms II | Itta Bena, MS 38941 | $264,681 |
| 12 | Buck Harris Planting Company | Cruger, MS 38924 | $259,042 |
| 13 | Highlandale Planting | Schlater, MS 38952 | $242,540 |
| 14 | Buckhorn Farms Partners | Schlater, MS 38952 | $232,806 |
| 15 | Archer Farms | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $231,149 |
| 16 | Seek Farms | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $230,646 |
| 17 | Ashley Selman Farms Partnership | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $223,107 |
| 18 | Itta Bena Plantation III | Itta Bena, MS 38941 | $209,117 |
| 19 | Walter Pillow & Sons Planting Co | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $195,163 |
| 20 | Ray Makamson Farms | Itta Bena, MS 38941 | $194,098 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf