Total Conservation Programs in Washington County, Mississippi, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 88
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Washington County, Mississippi totaled $693,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Murrell Farms | Avon, MS 38723 | $74,475 |
| 2 | Wilmont Wildlife Partnership | Leland, MS 38756 | $40,562 |
| 3 | Katherine Cauley | Edgewood, NM 87015 | $35,091 |
| 4 | Montgomery Mcgee | Greenville, MS 38701 | $33,727 |
| 5 | Nelson King Farms | Chatham, MS 38731 | $31,985 |
| 6 | Steele Farms | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $31,327 |
| 7 | Hilde Marie Waerstad | Cambridge, MA 02238 | $25,333 |
| 8 | Robert Holland | Leland, MS 38756 | $23,042 |
| 9 | Torrey Wood And Son Inc | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $19,595 |
| 10 | Roy Williams | Boyle, MS 38730 | $18,858 |
| 11 | Holly Ridge Planting Co | Indianola, MS 38751 | $18,513 |
| 12 | Rex Livingston - Rex Livingston R | Leland, MS 38756 | $18,157 |
| 13 | Guessford Agricultural Properties LLC | Greenville, MS 38702 | $17,034 |
| 14 | Leroy V Frey | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $16,849 |
| 15 | J R Nunnery Jr | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $12,348 |
| 16 | Lena Rivers Thach | Hattiesburg, MS 39401 | $12,090 |
| 17 | Refuge Land Company LLC | Greenville, MS 38702 | $11,562 |
| 18 | Ray Joe Quong | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $10,045 |
| 19 | Neff Planting Co Inc | Arcola, MS 38722 | $9,760 |
| 20 | W C Woodruff | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $9,520 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf