Direct Payment Program in Yazoo County, Mississippi, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 844
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Yazoo County, Mississippi totaled $78,588,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Phillips Farms | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $3,555,738 |
2 | Norway Farms II | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $2,911,128 |
3 | Grosvenor Farms | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $2,777,679 |
4 | Seward & Son Planting Company | Louise, MS 39097 | $2,426,107 |
5 | Jordan Planting Company | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $1,989,812 |
6 | Seward & Harris Planting Company | Louise, MS 39097 | $1,702,263 |
7 | Valley Planting Company | Satartia, MS 39162 | $1,517,430 |
8 | Erickson Planting Company | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $1,478,196 |
9 | Deerfield Partners | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $1,470,466 |
10 | Kilby Company | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $1,345,771 |
11 | Broadlake Ltd | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $1,286,797 |
12 | Cato Farms | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $1,226,345 |
13 | Moore Farms | Vaughan, MS 39179 | $1,157,826 |
14 | Day Place Farms | Vaughan, MS 39179 | $1,130,509 |
15 | Fouche Farms II | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $1,078,957 |
16 | Swayze Farms | Benton, MS 39039 | $1,044,388 |
17 | Coghlan & Sons | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $976,107 |
18 | Fouche Farms | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $964,574 |
19 | Harris Land & Cattle Co | Benton, MS 39039 | $952,055 |
20 | David & Cynthia Shipp Partners | Benton, MS 39039 | $949,739 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>