Farm Subsidy information
Missouri
Total Subsidies in Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 219,935
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Missouri totaled $17,422,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dabbs Farms | Fisk, MO 63940 | $4,824,319 |
42 | Larry Bradfield Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $4,815,279 |
43 | Hrb Farming Partnership | Mooresville, MO 64664 | $4,813,529 |
44 | Campbell Farms | Cooter, MO 63839 | $4,734,070 |
45 | Willow & Co | Bell City, MO 63735 | $4,609,967 |
46 | Jessie Carter Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $4,501,783 |
47 | Donnie Underwood Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $4,468,368 |
48 | Hayes Farm | Marston, MO 63866 | $4,422,812 |
49 | Burke Farms | Charleston, MO 63834 | $4,343,948 |
50 | Bracey Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $4,313,439 |
51 | Glenco Farms | Dudley, MO 63936 | $4,263,291 |
52 | M & M Ag Investments | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $4,237,426 |
53 | Minton Ag Co | Dexter, MO 63841 | $4,219,139 |
54 | Davis Farms | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $4,160,458 |
55 | Jamerson Farms | Hornersville, MO 63855 | $4,146,960 |
56 | Wayne Johnson Farms | Spickard, MO 64679 | $4,111,085 |
57 | Triple D Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $4,075,736 |
58 | Niemeyer Family Farms | Bowling Green, MO 63334 | $4,053,647 |
59 | Gary Murphy Farms | Bernie, MO 63822 | $3,989,440 |
60 | Kimes Bros | Portageville, MO 63873 | $3,989,388 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”