Grasslands Reserve Program in Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 608
Recipients of Grasslands Reserve Program from farms in Missouri totaled $7,191,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Grasslands Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Maurice Fugate | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $265,800 |
2 | Vera Whitesell | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $221,850 |
3 | Missouri Prairie Foundation | Columbia, MO 65205 | $143,277 |
4 | Mabel M Hill Trust | Novinger, MO 63559 | $101,992 |
5 | Bluestem Ranch LLC | Rich Hill, MO 64779 | $95,000 |
6 | Elizabeth Teel Galante | New Orleans, LA 70115 | $82,230 |
7 | Patricia A Dick Living Trust | Bunceton, MO 65237 | $79,080 |
8 | Michael K Chapman | Calhoun, MO 65323 | $78,795 |
9 | Rodney M Drenon | Windsor, MO 65360 | $64,409 |
10 | C Hildon Winebarger Revocable Tru | Sainte Genevieve, MO 63670 | $59,256 |
11 | Norman Albert Valle | De Soto, MO 63020 | $57,088 |
12 | Mary Lee Froman-ellis Rev Trust | Gallatin, MO 64640 | $54,720 |
13 | David W Callis | Sedalia, MO 65301 | $52,549 |
14 | Michel G Singleton | Lockwood, MO 65682 | $52,304 |
15 | Wilbert W Power Trust | Mexico, MO 65265 | $51,870 |
16 | Gary Albrecht | Norborne, MO 64668 | $50,094 |
17 | Scotty E Henderson | Warsaw, MO 65355 | $47,869 |
18 | Philip E Baylor | Fayette, MO 65248 | $47,698 |
19 | John T Neale | Jerico Springs, MO 64756 | $46,648 |
20 | David Staus | Smithton, MO 65350 | $46,410 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>