Farm Subsidy information
Missouri
Total Subsidies in Missouri, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 76,402
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Missouri totaled $1,602,000,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Farm Credit Southeast Missouri ** | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $9,918,348 |
2 | Southern Bank ** | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $6,311,470 |
3 | Focus Bank ** | Charleston, MO 63834 | $3,879,036 |
4 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $3,819,802 |
5 | First State Bank And Trust Branch ** | Caruthersville, MO 63830 | $3,555,208 |
6 | First Missouri Bank Of Semo ** | Kennett, MO 63857 | $2,965,340 |
7 | Bank Of Missouri ** | Charleston, MO 63834 | $2,499,653 |
8 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $2,472,395 |
9 | Alliance Bank ** | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $1,810,256 |
10 | Fcs Financial ** | Chillicothe, MO 64601 | $1,763,444 |
11 | Kirby & Sons | Liberal, MO 64762 | $1,739,747 |
12 | Ham Hill Farms Inc | Marshall, MO 65340 | $1,569,461 |
13 | Two Mile Pork LLC | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $1,500,000 |
14 | Harrison Creek Farms LLC | Auxvasse, MO 65231 | $1,419,205 |
15 | Prairie View Pork LLC | Drexel, MO 64742 | $1,391,633 |
16 | Joplin Regional Stockyards Inc | Mount Vernon, MO 65712 | $1,222,755 |
17 | First Missouri State Bank ** | Poplar Bluff, MO 63902 | $1,221,010 |
18 | Dale Farming Company | Ridgeway, MO 64481 | $1,149,921 |
19 | 7-r Farms Inc | New Haven, MO 63068 | $1,145,318 |
20 | Maher Brothers Inc | Monroe City, MO 63456 | $1,111,065 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>