Loan Deficiency in Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 65,790
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Missouri totaled $1,197,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Campbell Farms | Cooter, MO 63839 | $658,991 |
| 22 | Brown & Dodson Farms | Dexter, MO 63841 | $655,654 |
| 23 | Minton Ag Co | Dexter, MO 63841 | $653,248 |
| 24 | L Keith & Darell Crow | Dexter, MO 63841 | $651,254 |
| 25 | R J S Burke Partnership | Charleston, MO 63834 | $651,253 |
| 26 | Mrm Farms LLC | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $635,621 |
| 27 | Dale Farming Company | Ridgeway, MO 64481 | $633,712 |
| 28 | Donald F Underwood Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $630,455 |
| 29 | Davis Farms | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $603,289 |
| 30 | Lmt Venture | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $599,766 |
| 31 | Bracey Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $597,469 |
| 32 | Tilly Farms Inc | Odessa, MO 64076 | $596,150 |
| 33 | Stewart & Stewart | Bloomfield, MO 63825 | $593,655 |
| 34 | Ben Hunter Farms | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $589,256 |
| 35 | Moreton Partnership | Charleston, MO 63834 | $588,378 |
| 36 | Jessie Carter Farms | Steele, MO 63877 | $579,581 |
| 37 | Donnie Underwood Farms | Portageville, MO 63873 | $577,525 |
| 38 | Tweedie Farms Inc | Richmond, MO 64085 | $567,222 |
| 39 | Deppe Farms Inc | Washington, MO 63090 | $565,697 |
| 40 | M & M Ag Investments | East Prairie, MO 63845 | $564,630 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf