Total Conservation Programs in Missouri, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 68,270

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Missouri totaled $2,883,000,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2021
1Dale Farming CompanyRidgeway, MO 64481$3,137,859
2Wyatt Farms Enterprises LLCCallao, MO 63534$1,486,438
3Kenneth D Sandy Jr Revocable TrustKidder, MO 64649$1,282,280
4William J Engel JrDenver, MO 64441$1,270,576
5David S CochranTrenton, MO 64683$1,269,326
6Bock Bros TimberCharleston, MO 63834$1,268,340
7Missouri Ranches IncEast Helena, MT 59635$1,262,998
8James Faris Walker IIIMarietta, GA 30062$1,233,970
9Thomas J DevenyEdina, MO 63537$1,223,353
10Godfrey Resources IncUnionville, MO 63565$1,219,344
11James S Cross Revocable TrustCallao, MO 63534$1,211,341
12Hilltop Grain Company IncPolo, MO 64671$1,209,667
13Gerald R Allgood Living TrustWichita, KS 67204$1,193,154
14Frank AkersAlbany, MO 64402$1,187,593
15Cooley Farm Service IncLucerne, MO 64655$1,175,592
16Evelyn BechtelBurlington, IA 52601$1,168,868
17Robert W WilsonKahoka, MO 63445$1,166,943
18Oak Bur Farms IncGallatin, MO 64640$1,163,646
19Robards Crain FarmsKansas City, MO 64157$1,162,552
20Laverne J Kremer Trust - Laverne KremerDecatur, IL 62522$1,161,125

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag