Deficiency Payment in Butler County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,007
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Butler County, Missouri totaled $15,887,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Davis Farms | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $237,701 |
| 2 | Lmt Venture | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $200,073 |
| 3 | Stacy Farms | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $159,657 |
| 4 | Savat Farms | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $151,808 |
| 5 | Dabbs Farms | Fisk, MO 63940 | $139,897 |
| 6 | Clark Farm Enterprises | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $115,518 |
| 7 | Nelson & Nelson | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $107,980 |
| 8 | Stull Farms | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $105,998 |
| 9 | Berry Brothers Farms | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $93,218 |
| 10 | Dennis Robison | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $88,563 |
| 11 | Richard Yarbro | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $88,086 |
| 12 | Ozell Johnson Revocable Living Tr | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $87,210 |
| 13 | Charles Parker Johnson | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $87,205 |
| 14 | Rmc Agri Inc | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $87,200 |
| 15 | Cloyce Sowell | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $86,555 |
| 16 | Rodney Russell Eaker | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $86,446 |
| 17 | Larry Hover | Naylor, MO 63953 | $85,821 |
| 18 | Ni-shell Inc | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $85,477 |
| 19 | R R & C Inc | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $84,781 |
| 20 | Charles Pirc Estate | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $84,560 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf