Farm Subsidy information
Butler County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Butler County, Missouri, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 965
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Butler County, Missouri totaled $24,059,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Farm Credit Southeast Missouri ** | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $3,047,952 |
| 2 | First Missouri State Bank ** | Poplar Bluff, MO 63902 | $1,200,903 |
| 3 | Southern Bank ** | Sikeston, MO 63801 | $574,503 |
| 4 | Wright Brothers Partnership | Qulin, MO 63961 | $393,511 |
| 5 | Dabbs Farms | Fisk, MO 63940 | $304,933 |
| 6 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $274,177 |
| 7 | Page Farms | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $214,907 |
| 8 | Janes Family Partnership | Qulin, MO 63961 | $208,940 |
| 9 | Bjg Cattle Co LLC | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $193,932 |
| 10 | Stacy Farms | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $180,213 |
| 11 | Justin Savat Partnership | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $179,939 |
| 12 | Dennis Robison Farms LLC | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $164,790 |
| 13 | Worley Farms Partnership | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $164,350 |
| 14 | Buttrey Farms | Fisk, MO 63940 | $154,079 |
| 15 | Ethan Stuart Doyle | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $149,306 |
| 16 | Markel Allen Yarbro | Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | $145,383 |
| 17 | Nobles & Redmon Farming Partnership | Qulin, MO 63961 | $143,905 |
| 18 | Kevin Dale Ashcraft | Qulin, MO 63961 | $140,575 |
| 19 | Michael Steven Smody | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $138,963 |
| 20 | Patricia Jane Smody | Neelyville, MO 63954 | $138,962 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf