Farm Subsidy information
Cole County, Missouri
Total Subsidies in Cole County, Missouri, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,736
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cole County, Missouri totaled $40,118,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Donald Ray Yanskey | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $846,627 |
| 2 | Moreau Valley Farms Inc | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $776,301 |
| 3 | Charles A Steck | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $567,622 |
| 4 | Kerperin Farms LLC | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $515,088 |
| 5 | Trinklein Bros Farming Enterprise | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $488,889 |
| 6 | Jay Preston Fischer | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $410,357 |
| 7 | David O Braun | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $365,750 |
| 8 | Roger Lee Bruemmer | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $342,196 |
| 9 | Profits Point Farm LLC | Saint Thomas, MO 65076 | $340,047 |
| 10 | Monty Schmutzler | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $324,241 |
| 11 | William A Kautsch | Russellville, MO 65074 | $313,714 |
| 12 | Philip J Luebbering | Saint Thomas, MO 65076 | $307,377 |
| 13 | Kenneth Oliver Propst | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $282,798 |
| 14 | Doris Mae Propst | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $275,993 |
| 15 | Kelly Ray Forck | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $272,246 |
| 16 | Steck Farms LLC | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $257,411 |
| 17 | William E Lepage | Centertown, MO 65023 | $242,937 |
| 18 | Ian Albert Steck | Jefferson City, MO 65109 | $235,125 |
| 19 | Stephen Joseph Suthoff | Saint Thomas, MO 65076 | $228,427 |
| 20 | Jesse Allen Bruemmer | Jefferson City, MO 65101 | $214,016 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf